Archive

Archive for October, 2010

10 Fun and Weird Candy Facts [Happy Halloween!]

October 31st, 2010 10 comments

1. Candy became widely available only 130 years ago. Until then, people would make their own fudge or caramel at home.

2. Candy is a health scapegoat – 100 years ago, doctors blamed candy for the spread of polio. In the mid to late 20th century it was blamed for tooth decay. Now it is blamed for obesity.

3. Candy accounts for only 6% of the added sugar in the American diet. Soft drinks and juice account for 46%.

4. Candy is the 575th most popular name for girls.

5. Candy lacks the “health halo” of granola bars and fruit juice. But, nutritionally there is much less difference among them than would initially seem.

6. There are entire blogs dedicated to candy. Popular ones include Candy Addict, Candy Blog, and Candy Professor.

7. It’s unbelievable now, but candy once was advertised as health food. “Eat Tootsie Rolls — The Luscious Candy That Helps Beat Fatigue.”

8. The world’s largest chocolate bar was manufactured in Armenia last month and weighed in at 9,722.39 lbs., setting a new Guinness World Record.

9. John Candy (1950 – 1994) struggled most of his adult life with overeating, including sweets. Obesity related health complications killed him at the age of 43.

10. Candy isn’t always good. Just ask Hansel and Gretel.

Enjoy tonight!

Get Fooducated: RSS Subscription or Email Subscription

Follow us on twitter: twitter.com/fooducate

What Happens When You Mix Pepsi and a Hard Boiled Egg?

October 30th, 2010 66 comments

This is a guest blog post by  Lisa Cain, Ph.D
Most of the discussion on drinking soda has focused on high fructose corn syrup and its detrimental effects on blood sugar and weight.  But, what about your teeth?

Today, we are taking a page from a kindergarten teacher’s playbook.  This teacher uses a very visual experiment to help her class of 5 year olds understand what happens to teeth when you drink soda.

I have heard that if you immerse a baby tooth in Coke it will dissolve in 24 hours.  I checked into this myth and it isn’t true.  What IS true is that soda contains acid that will dissolve the enamel of teeth over time.

Our experiment is simple.  Take a hard boiled egg and immerse it in Pepsi or Coke for 24 hours and analyze your result.


Well, look at that!

The obvious conclusion for the 5 year olds is that you need to brush your teeth.  They take toothbrushes and scrub all the color off the egg to mimic brushing their teeth.

But, what does this experiment mean for us grown ups?  Well, I found a study that concluded that prolonged exposure to soda can lead to significant tooth enamel loss.

From the article:

The erosive potential of colas is 10 times that of fruit juices in just the first three minutes of drinking.

I doubt this is going to surprise anyone that the powerful combination of sugar, acid, and artificial color isn’t great for your teeth.  Back in my post on Monster Energy drinks, I reported that a kid had over 15 areas of decay on his teeth from drinking Monster.  The parents had a $6000 dental bill.  YIKES!

My suggestion is to treat soda like a treat.  Don’t drink it very often and when you do – brush your teeth soon after you drink it.

Please share this post with your soda drinking family, friends, and co-workers.  It might help them kick their habit.

Lisa Cain, Ph.D. writes about healthy snacks on Snack-Girl.com. She is a published author, mother of two, and avid snacker.

Get Fooducated: RSS Subscription or Email Subscription

Follow us on twitter: twitter.com/fooducate

Oh No! More Industry Sponsored Nutrition Labels

October 29th, 2010 12 comments

Earlier this week, the two largest food and beverage trade organizations announced a new industry initiative for Front-of-Package (FOP) nutrition labeling of groceries. The Food Marketing Institute (FMI) and Grocery Manufacturers Association (GMA) issued a joint press release:

America’s leading food and beverage manufacturers and retailers joined forces today in the fight against obesity and announced their commitment to develop a new front-of-package nutrition labeling system. The unprecedented consumer initiative will make it easier for busy consumers to make informed choices when they shop. read more…

The organizations are throwing $50 Million into this effort in order to “educate consumers”:

“The food and beverage industry is committed to empowering consumers by providing them with the products, tools and information they need to achieve and maintain a healthy diet…”

Here’s what David Mackay, the CEO of Kellogg’s had to say:

“This is a landmark step forward in the industry’s commitment to help address the obesity challenge. It represents the most significant change to food labels in the United States in nearly twenty years.”

Baloney. Just last year Kellogg’s was part of another industry sponsored attempt to fool consumers. The short lived Smart Choice Program gave thumbs up to products such as Froot Loops.

If the industry spent as much energy making their food healthy as they do on these labeling smoke and mirrors perhaps we’d all be better off. but then again, you can’t make a healthy pop-tart, no matter how hard you’ll try.

What you need to know:

This move is not about obesity prevention, or sudden goodwill by the food industry. This is what nutrition professor and fellow blogger Marion Nestle calls a preemptive strike:

There is only one explanation for this move: heading off the FDA’s Front-of-Package (FOP) labeling initiatives.

We agree. Just two weeks ago we reported on the courageous report by the Institute of Medicine which recommended only four parameters be considered for display on FOP labels: calories, saturated fat, trans-fat, and sodium. These are all negatives, and the usage of the FOP would thus be to warn people away from bad-for-health foods.

This is just something that manufacturers can’t have happen, simply because most of the foods would be negatively marked. If you don’t think so, check out the Guiding Stars system founded by Hannaford Supermarkets in the Northeast and now available in 1600 supermarkets. Less than 10% of their products qualify for a healthy “star” or more. Which means 90% of the products could potentially be labeled negatively. Only 25% of the items qualify for one or more stars, which means 3 out of 4 could potentially be labeled negatively. [thank you Guiding Stars for the corrections].

If that would happen, people may actually reduce their spending on processed crap. And that would hurt the industry’s bottom line.

What to do at the supermarket:

You know our mantra, never ever believe the marketing BS on food packages even if it looks like a presidential seal of approval. The information you seek is on the nutrition facts panel and the ingredient list. Read it before you eat it! And if you have any question, please let us know.

Get Fooducated: RSS Subscription or Email Subscription

Follow us on twitter: twitter.com/fooducate

Snack Binge: It’s Not Your Fault, It’s the Package!

October 28th, 2010 8 comments

There’s an interesting study published in the October issue of the Journal of Consumer Psychology. The researchers, Adriana Madzharov and Lauren Block of Baruch College, CUNY, wanted to observe the effect of product package information on consumer behavior.

More specifically, they wanted to see if a package depicting more units of the food would induce a consumer to eat more. For example, will a bag of chips with 15 chips showing on it cause people to eat more than a bag showing just 5?

What do you think they found out?

What you need to know:
1. The number of items on the front of the package affects people’s judgments of how much food is inside. People also judged the portion size to be bigger when there were many items pictured on the package than when there were few.

2. People ate more food from packages with many items pictured on them than from packages with few items pictured on them.

3. Visual thinkers were most impacted.

What to do at the supermarket:

Now that you know about an additional facet of marketing psychology, how can you fight the urge to eat more? Not easy, but if you could set some house rules:

  • Never eat directly from the bag, rather place snack into a plate or bowl, thus exercising restraint and portion control.
  • Buy 100 calorie packs. Psychologically it’s hard to open another package once you’ve finished the first.
  • Keep a very limited amount of snacks in your pantry at any given time. Yes, this means forgoing a lot of those awesome double-coupon, buy 1 get 3 free “deals.”

(thanks EC, for the hat-tip)

Get Fooducated: RSS Subscription or Email Subscription

Follow us on twitter: twitter.com/fooducate

“Grapples” – Apples that Taste Like Grapes

October 27th, 2010 11 comments

We love apples. We love grapes. Kids do too. Great natural snacks. That’s why we were very intrigued to learn about the existence of Grapple (pronounced Grape – L).

Grapple is a new fruit, or so we thought, that combines the look and mouthfeel of apples with the taste of grapes. After taking a closer look, here is what we discovered.

What you need to know:

Grapples are apples. What the grapple company has done is soak them in flavored water, letting the “flavor blend” infuse the apple through the skin.

Nutritionally, these are the same as regular apples. The ingredient list is:

apples, natural and artificial flavor

We don’t look too kindly on added flavorings, whether natural or artificial. If a product is good enough, why add any flavors that were concocted in a lab?

Apples are so tasty to begin with, so why mess around with them?

This sounds like a nice gimmick, and we’re certainly curious to taste it. But with so many varieties of plain apples out there to choose from, Grapples probably won’t be a staple fruit in our routine.

Thank you Katie for the hat tip.

Get Fooducated: RSS Subscription or Email Subscription

Follow us on twitter: twitter.com/fooducate

Categories: Fruit, News, Snacks Tags: , ,

Trick or (tiny) Treat

October 26th, 2010 8 comments

With Halloween coming up this weekend, you’re probably reading and viewing lots of advice regarding chocolate choices and snack strategies. While some may go out of their way to prepare and receive only healthy snacks, we’re of the mass market camp, allowing the kids to enjoy whatever is handed to them. This is, after all, a once in a year event.

One of the things manufacturers have done to make life easier on us (and our pocketbooks) is the mini-size candies and chocolates, that tend to become more prevalent in the months leading up to All Saint’s Day.

Financially, handing out mini-candies can help stretch your budget. On the receiving end, your kids get less junk food to chomp down.

We picked up a mix bag of Kit-Kat minis and checked it out.

What you need to know:

A bag contains 35 pieces (“fingers”). A serving is considered FIVE (5!!!) fingers. It has 210 calories, almost half from saturated fat, the rest from sugar (about 5 teaspoons worth).

But if we divide this by 5, and consume only one chocolate finger – we’re paying only 42 calories, less than 2 grams of fat, and only one teaspoon of sugar.

If our kids (and we, for that matter) learn not to gobble down candy, this mini-sized trend may be a good way to enjoy treats without going overboard.

What to do at the supermarket:

Look for bite sized snack bags.

Check ingredient lists for chocolate candies without partially hydrogenated oils (trans-fats).

Choose candies without artificial colors (Yellow #5,  Red #40, etc…)

Get Fooducated: RSS Subscription or Email Subscription

Follow us on twitter: twitter.com/fooducate

Whole Foods Market Pilots Non-GMO Labels

October 25th, 2010 14 comments

Heard about GMO?

Genetically modified organisms are plants or animals that have had their DNA altered through gene splicing techniques. This enable scientists to insert the DNA from one species into that of another in order to obtain a certain desired effect, for example resistance to pests. From a purely scientific perspective, this is an amazing advancement.

The US is a world “leader” in GMO crops, and most of the soy, corn, beets and canola grown here is genetically modified. This is a relatively new science, and the pros and cons are still being weighed among experts.

The FDA estimates that 3 out of 4 processed foods in a typical US supermarket contain GMO ingredients. But shoppers have no clue which products are GMO and which are not. This is because the agricultural lobbies convinced the government that GMO corn is no different from regular corn in its gastronomic and nutritional qualities and therefore needs no special marking.

Bu the reason is much simpler: If people could choose between a known product without GMOs, or the same exact version but labeled as containing GMOs, most would play it safe and choose no-GMO. Too bad we don’t have a choice. In Europe, where products that are genetically modified must be labeled, this is the case. That’s why there are hardly any GMO foods to be found in the EU.

The Non-GMO project has set at its goal to raise people’s awareness to this matter and created a label (yes, another label…)

Whole Foods Market has partnered with the Non-GMO Project in order to raise consumer awareness of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in foods, according to Food Navigator:

About 580 natural food stores have said they will take part in Non-GMO Month this month. Nearly 900 products have qualified so far to carry the Non-GMO Project seal, which uses a verification program combining on-site audits, genetic testing of ingredients and a document-based review to confirm that foods do not contain GM ingredients.

The Non-GMO Project was established last year, but this month heralds the arrival of its verification seal on retail products. Whole Foods Market has put forward its entire 365 Every Day Value private label product range for authentication by the scheme and said it expects to announce additional verified products during October. read more…

Will this have any substantial impact on mainstream shoppers? It’s hard to see changes anytime soon. Today your only way of verifying the food you buy is GMO-free, is to buy organic.

Get Fooducated: RSS Subscription or Email Subscription

Follow us on twitter: twitter.com/fooducate

Categories: News, Organic Tags: , ,

Which is Healthier for Me – Tea or Coffee ?

October 24th, 2010 3 comments

Inhabitants of earth can be roughly divided in to 2 groups: tea lovers and coffee addicts. Some countries are home to many more of one kind than the other. The US is a coffee nation, but the UK and many parts of Asia are firmly rooted in tea culture.

That said, many people enjoy both drinks.  We decided to compare them from the nutrition aspect, just for kicks.

What you need to know:
Both coffee and tea contain virtually no calories when mixed with water. For many people the “straight” taste is too bitter or incomplete and they must add sugar and/or cream. But the actual tea leaf or coffee bean is virtually calorie-less. With no fat, no sodium, and no carbs – where can you go wrong?

Both beverages contain caffeine, with coffee about twice as much as tea for a comparable cup of hot drink. Caffeine in reasonable amounts during the day (3 cups of coffee or six cups of tea) is actually considered healthy for most people, as it helps kick start the metabolism. If you work out in the morning, a quick cuppa joe before your 2 mile jog will help you perform better.

Coffee has some B vitamins, potassium and other minerals while Tea is high in manganese, folate and potassium. So both can a bit of nutrient goodness to your daily mix. But the main reason tea has become so popular in health circles is the cancer-fighting antioxidants green tea purports to provide our bodies.

And a recent study published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition showed that daily intakes of more than 100 ml of tea or coffee may significantly reduce the risk of certain brain tumors. Nice.

So will it be a burning hot shot of espresso at 7am, or 4 o’clock Earl Grey?

As long as you stick to the basic liquid, seems like there is no need to choose sides here. Both these hot drinks are harmless in sane quantities throughout the day, and may even provide a few nutritional benefits to their fans.

If you’re adding sugar or artificial sweeteners, challenge yourself to gradually reduce the amount by half.  From experience, you can go down from 2 teaspoons to 1 within a few weeks to months, and then down from one to none within a similar time frame.

What to do at the supermarket:

Take a look at the ingredient lists to make sure no surprise ingredients have been added to your coffee beans or your tea leaves.

Get Fooducated: RSS Subscription or Email Subscription

Follow us on twitter: twitter.com/fooducate

Eight Myths About Vegetarians and Vegetarian Food

October 22nd, 2010 43 comments

This is a guest blog post by Daniel Koontz

Long-time readers know all about Casual Kitchen’s predilection for what we call part-time vegetarianism. Since vegetarian cuisine is typically very inexpensive, one great way to stretch your food budget and make your diet healthier is to replace two or three meat-based meals each week with vegetarian dishes.

However, since we straddle the world of meat-eaters and meat-avoiders, I’m often shocked by the many misconceptions that otherwise perfectly normal people hold about vegetarian cuisine. This post is an effort to put these myths to rest once and for all.

Myth #1: You can’t get enough protein eating vegetarian food.
Nonsense. The standard Western diet contains several times the amount of protein the human body needs, thus those of us who embrace part time vegetarianism and eat two or three veggie meals a week have absolutely nothing to worry about. Moreover, full-time vegetarians only need to eat a well-balanced diet with a serving of dairy or eggs every day or so to meet their protein needs. Vegans have a bit more work to do here to get enough protein, but a diet containing generous servings of whole grains, legumes, and nuts will easily do the trick.

Myth #2: There isn’t enough fat in a vegetarian diet.
Anyone who’s ever met up with a big tub of delicious guacamole knows that fat is hardly limited to meat-based meals. And the standard Western diet is so fat-laden that we can easily ingest far more fat than we need. The fact that most vegetarian meals contain much less fat than most meat-centered meals is an advantage, not a disadvantage. Veggie cuisine makes eating healthy a lot easier.

Myth #3: Vegetarianism has to be all or nothing.
Here at Casual Kitchen, we embrace and enjoy vegetarian cuisine, but we are not–and probably never will be–vegetarians. Nobody says you have to make a one-way, Do Not Pass Go, permanent-for-all-time conversion to vegetarianism. Try veggie cuisine with an open mind once in a while, enjoy the health and cost benefits, and just see what you think. And then feel free to go right back to your regular meat-based diet.

Myth #4: Vegetarian diets are limited and boring.
Actually the exact reverse is true: so many meals depend on meat that cutting it out as the centerpiece of your diet literally forces you to vary your diet more. In my experience, vegetarians and partial vegetarians generally eat a much wider range of foods than the typical meat-eater.

Myth #5: You can’t eat junk food on a vegetarian diet.
Heavens no. Not even close. Remember, Oreos are vegetarian. So are Doritos, potato chips and ice cream. Heck, so are Krispy Kreme donuts. You can eat a hellaciously bad diet and still call yourself a vegetarian. If you want to, that is.

Myth #6: Vegetarian food never fills me up.
Count us among the people who used to think this–until we tried some amazing, mind-opening recipes like Groundnut Stew from the amazing Sundays at Moosewood Restaurant, or Smoky Brazilian Black Bean Soup, or Spanish Chickpea and Garlic Soup. Try out these recipes in your home, and when you find that you can’t get up from the dinner table, you’ll also change your mind about how filling vegetarian food is.

Myth #7: Vegetarian culture is too weird. And I don’t want to wear tie-dye.
You’d be surprised how much the demographics of vegetarianism have changed over the years. Sure, thirty years ago, back when vegetarianism was a smallish clique of crunchy communities in places like Berkeley, CA and Ithaca, NY, you could make the argument that crunchy behavior and tie-dye clothing used to be the standard. But the typical vegetarian today is more Sex and the City than crunchy–in other words, the modern vegetarian is the type of person who wouldn’t be caught dead wearing tie-dye.

Myth #8: Vegetarians are freakish militants intent on banning all meat.
If you took the time to actually get to know some vegetarians, you’d find the vast majority of them are quite peaceful, and they certainly don’t lie awake at night worrying about what you just had for dinner. Yes, you’ll find a few proselytizers here and there, but you can usually scare them off by waving your leather belt in a threatening manner. Most vegetarians quietly go about their business eating a healthy and perfectly satisfying diet, and they are okay with you eating meat if that’s what you choose to do.

Daniel Koontz is the author of Casual Kitchen, a blog dedicated to helping readers cook more, think more and spend less.

.

.

Get Fooducated: RSS Subscription or Email Subscription

Follow us on twitter: twitter.com/fooducate

40% of Kids’ Calories are from Junk Food

October 21st, 2010 24 comments

Wondering why childhood obesity is running rampant?

Now you know.

They’re eating crap. This, according to statistics compiled by the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey  (NHANES) and reported by ABC News.

Half of the fattening calories come from just 6 foods:

  1. Soda
  2. Sugary fruit drinks
  3. Grain desserts, such as cake, cookies and donuts
  4. Dairy desserts such as ice cream
  5. Pizza
  6. Whole milk, which is far fattier than skim.

We’re surprised french fries are not on the list.

Why is this happening to us and how can we stop it?

What you need to know:

There are multiple reasons for childhood obesity:

  • nutritionally deficient school lunches (based on subsidized crops)
  • cheap fast food (based on subsidized crops)
  • commercials for kids featuring junk food (made from subsidized crops)
  • parents that don’t have enough time to cook and can prepare a microwave meal in 5 minutes from frozen entrees (based on cheap subsidized crops)

So how do we get kids to eat healthier food?

Perhaps the USDA should start subsidizing fruits and vegetables other than corn and soy. But the agro-lobbies are too powerful for anyone to battle.  Our Congress and Senate won’t tackle them, nor will the president.

Oh well, at least Mrs. Obama is spearheading Let’s Move, a well intended but guaranteed-to-fail program to end childhood obesity within one generation.

Sorry for the rant, but we really needed to vent after seeing these stats.

Get Fooducated: RSS Subscription or Email Subscription

Follow us on twitter: twitter.com/fooducate

Soda
Sugary fruit drinks
Grain desserts, such as cake, cookies and donuts
Dairy desserts such as ice cream
Pizza
Whole milk, which is far fattier than skim.