FTC Accuses POM of False Advertsing

The Federal Trade Commission announced yesterday that it has filed a complaint against POM Wonderful for deceptive advertising. From the FTC:

As part of its ongoing efforts to uncover over-hyped health claims in food advertising, the Federal Trade Commission has issued an administrative complaint charging the makers of POM Wonderful 100% Pomegranate Juice and POMx supplements with making false and unsubstantiated claims that their products will prevent or treat heart disease, prostate cancer, and erectile dysfunction.

The FTC complaint charges that POM Wonderful LLC, sister corporation Roll International Corp., and principals Stewart Resnick, Lynda Resnick, and Matthew Tupper violated federal law by making deceptive disease prevention and treatment claims.  The ads in question appeared in national publications such as Parade, Fitness, The New York Times, and Prevention magazines; on Internet sites such as pomtruth.com, pomwonderful.com, and pompills.com; on bus stops and billboards; in newsletters to customers; and on tags attached to the product. read more…

POM boasts having spent over $30 Million on dozens of studies that prove their products’ superior antioxidant properties. The FTC does not seem impressed.

In an almost immediate response to the FTC’s allegations, POM said:

“POM Wonderful fundamentally disagrees with the FTC and believes that the commission’s allegations against POM are completely unwarranted.

Pomegranates are food – highly nutritious produce, designed by nature itself.  Because POM products may in fact offer the promise of better health, we believe it is important to share the research results as they become available.  This is especially true since our products do not carry the risks associated with pharmaceutical drugs.  It’s a shame that the government is unable to understand this fundamental distinction, and instead is wasting taxpayer resources to persecute the pomegranate.

We do not make claims that our products act as drugs.  What we do, rather, is communicate, through advertising, the promising science relating to pomegranates.  Consumers and their health providers have a right to know about this research and its results.”

What you need to know:

We wrote about POM earlier this year. It is one of our favorite juice treats, enjoyed every once in a while for its amazing blend of tart and sweet. And yes, the fact that it is 100% pomegranate juice and not some fizzy pop does play into account.

However, lets not kid ourselves – the potential health benefits of a daily does of POM are overshadowed by the 17 tsp of sugar in each personal consumption bottle. Much better to eat the real deal, messy squirting red seeds and all.

As you probably know, all fruits and vegetables are good for you. Pomegranate included. But fruit juice is a different story. It loses much of the nutritional potency of the original fruit, especially the fiber. What it does gain is a very concentrated dose of sugar.

What to do at the supermarket:

As treats go, POM is great. But for daily consumption, save your money and choose tap water.

Get Fooducated

  • http://www.feedyourheaddiet.com Ken Leebow

    The fact that a 16 ounce bottle is 300 calories is enough reason to stay away from POM.

  • huba

    Can somebody explain to me what happens to the dietary fiber during juice-production? Where does it go? I just don’t understand. Thanks.

  • Heidi

    they should call it pomegranite syrup!

  • carol

    @huba
    Fiber is in the solids of a fruit (skin, pulp, flesh)… juice has had all that strained/pressed out. Juice is also usually heat treated to kill any bacteria so that it can keep longer on the store shelf, so there go the vitamins too (especially C) along with other antioxidants.

  • jessica

    i hate it when companies try to capitalize on nature. I loved it when pomagranites came in season and my mom would cut one in half and i got to bite into all those juicy seeds, get them stuck in my teeth and spit them out in the sink! We really do turn our backs on mother nature some times.

  • Amorette

    Is the 17 tsp of sugar you are referring to naturally occuring or added?

  • http://www.fooducate.com/blog Editorial Staff

    @Amorette
    naturally occuring

  • http://www.livingitupcornfree.com kc

    I’m not a juice drinker by nature, but if I did drink juice Pom would be the one. The fact that Pom is pure pomegranate juice with no added vitamins or ascorbic acid (GMO corn derivatives) makes it safe for the corn allergic and one of the very few juices available to us. I find it beyond ironic that a government agency is persecuting a company that makes a product that is truly what it claims to be and nothing more. No added vitamins, preservatives, fillers, sweeteners…..in other words, no added corn.

  • http://fuducate Glen Shue

    I am a retired nutrition/chemist of the FDA and admittedly somewhat biased against the big industries and their activities to make money. For the question above: where does the fiber go, hopefully it goes goes to a composter and finds its way back to improve someone’s soil, if not, it would likely add to a land fill. If the label does not mention sugar as an ingredient, it is natural and, by the way, all fructose. That’s another irritation I have concerning the Health Food people re: high fructose corn syrup/sugar. Many of those are indistinguishable from honey {except for flavor) and ordinary sugar is 50/50 glucose/fructose. The common name for fructose is ‘fruit sugar’. I have no idea what the association between ascorbic acid and “GMO corn derivatives” is. Ascorbic acid is a pure chemical and whether natural or synthesized is identical. Most all supplemental vitamin C is synthesized. I heard about the claim re: prostate treatment, and tried some of it but decided it was not at all worth the price so I stick with apple, grape and tomato juices (tomato has more pulp/fiber) and take 2,000 IU of vit D/day which is far, far cheaper and works better. I’d like to include grapefruit but it messes up the dosage of my statin.

  • Malathi Ramji

    I am amazed at how many people think that eating the “real fruit” is always better than drinking a juice. If – as their video claims – the juice is made from the entire fruit – husk and all – with no added sugar – then it is more nutritious than just eating the fruit – “messy seeds” and all. Nobody ever eats the husk of the fruit – that would normally be discarded. Most fruits concentrate their nutrients in the husk – or rind – the part that is thrown away. The mangosteen is another example of a nutrient-rich fruit – in which the major concentration of phytonutrients is in the rind – the part that is usually thrown away when the fresh fruit is consumed. When a company creates a juice made from the “whole fruit” – rind and all – it is much more nutritious than the fresh fruit.