Kix Kids’ Cereal – Optimal Mix of Taste and Nutrition?

Kix is a kid’s cereal that’s been around for over 70 years. It recently went through what marketing professionals call a “brand refresh”. See the new package image above.

The package promises “Kid Tested, Mother Approved”. So we had two fooducate community members receive a sample box to try with their kids (and get their approval), while we went over the nutrition information.

Here’s what Laura, a mom with 4 kids wrote: First, I measured the recommended 1 1/4-cup serving of Kix cereal with 1/2-cup milk. Then I let my four kids, between ages 5 and 12, run with it.  Being an entirely new experience for them, these are a few of the things they said while eating:

“Well, it’s really sweet.”
“It tastes like corn.”
“It’s pretty basic, and I like that.”
“It tastes really sweet at first and then just like corn.”
“I don’t really like corn.”
“I could eat this everyday.”

Overall, during the experience itself, my kids and I were satisfied.  The cereal was fun to eat, lightly crunchy–not one to tear the roof of one’s mouth apart–and rather sweet.  However, the serving size was quickly consumed, leaving four children looking around at each other and then inside the cupboards and refrigerator.  Just barely over one cup of the sweetly puffed cereal left my athletic and active kids still rather hungry.  So, I passed out a tangerine and planned for a heartier late-morning snack.

My own experience mirrors the kids’.  It was light, crunchy, rather sweet, and puffed corn for breakfast; fun to eat, but wholly unsatisfying by the end.  But, this comes from a family that eats oatmeal, pancakes, eggs and such for breakfasts.  For us, cereal is a once-in-a-while treat, so, although I liked the low-sugar levels of this brand, I would prefer more substance, more fiber perhaps.  Or, maybe we’ll just add some fruit and sausages on the side, if we ever choose to eat Kix again.

Here’s what Jessica wrote: I checked the label first thing, and the sugar content wasn’t bad, however, the sodium was really too high for my liking. This alone would keep me from purchasing this product. I do not like a breakfast cereal to have more sodium per serving than potato chips. It bothers me.

Aside from the sodium being high, we thought this would make a good occasional “busy snack”. As in, something small, non messy, and easily portable that our child can snack on while we’re on the go. It tasted good, and our toddler very much enjoyed a handful here and there. Being only 3 yrs old, he’s not much into cold cereal with milk yet.

I tried it as a breakfast for a few days, and honestly, I was left starving an hour later. At which point I resorted to a whole fruit to keep me feeling full until lunch. It really isn’t a very substantial breakfast, certainly not something I want my child to rely on for his morning meal.

I think the remainder of the box will be added to our homemade sugar free yogurt with fruit… sort of a kix parfait.

What you need to know:

A serving size is over one cup in size, but from a weight perspective is only 1 ounce. Such is the voluminous nature of puffed corn products. There are only 110 calories per serving. But as you can see from the reviews, a single serving is not enough. If you start consuming twice or 3 times the serving size, the calories will add up.

Each comes with 3 grams of fiber (good) and just 3 grams of sugar (very good for a kid cereal). The sodium count is high though – 180 mg or 8% of the daily value.

This is the ingredient list:

Whole Grain Corn, Corn Meal, Sugar, Corn Bran, Salt, Brown Sugar Syrup, Trisodium Phosphate. Vitamin E (Mixed Tocopherols) Added to Preserve Freshness. Vitamins and Minerals: Calcium Carbonate, Iron and Zinc (Mineral Nutrients), Vitamin C (Sodium Ascorbate), a B Vitamin (Niacinamide), Vitamin B6 (Pyridoxine Hydrochloride), Vitamin B2 (Riboflavin), Vitamin B1 (Thiamin Mononitrate), Vitamin A (Palmitate), a B Vitamin (Folic Acid), Vitamin B12, Vitamin D3.

You can see that whole grain corn is used, but not exclusively – corn meal is also used. The ingredients are easy to understand, up until the trisodium phosphate. This is a chemical used as food additive and also as a stain remover when painting. The rest of the ingredients are fortifications of vitamins and minerals.

Bottom line: Of sweetened kids cereals, Kix seems to be one of the better options. If only it were more filling.

PS: If you’ll take a look at the box again, you’ll see a marketing claim that we shrug off “Made with all natural corn”. What does that mean? Corn is natural isn’t it?

What to do at the supermarket:

When buying cereal, look for a sugar count lower than 6 grams AND a fiber count higher than 3 grams. Avoid artificial colorings and partially hydrogenated oils (trans-fat).

Get Fooducated

  • phriend of groc

    We use kix as a kids trail mix of sorts bt adding some dried fruit and nuts. Tghe kids seem to like that.

  • http://localnourishment.com Peggy

    “All natural” has basically no definition according to the FDA, and does not guarantee that the corn in Kix is not genetically modified. Also, the extrusion and puffing processes make this a very unhealthy food, regardless of the sugar and sodium it contains. Please see the article by Henry A. Schroeder, “Losses of Vitamins and Trace Minerals Resulting from Processing and Preservation of Foods,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1971 for more details on this.

  • http://foodtrainers.blogspot.com Lauren Slayton

    I don’t know your testers didn’t leave me convinced. “Not bad” is not enough, food should be delicious and satisfying. Having said this, I would normally pass over Kix and complete junk and now only think semi-junk.

  • http://plate-by-plate.com Penny

    I’m curious….what is the difference between whole grain corn and corn meal? Isn’t corn meal just whole corn ground into meal? I know when it comes to wheat they remove the wheat germ to turn it into less nutrious white flour. But is there really a difference between the two types of corn?

  • http://www.hurleyhealth.com Jan Hurley, RPh

    Another reader commented about genetic modification of food. That was the first thought I had concerning Kix. The majority of corn and soy produced in this country is genetically modified. This product does not state that they use non-GMO corn.
    I am leery of ingesting GM foods, because science has shown it is mutating our DNA, too.

  • Anne Noise

    I love, love, love Kix, but I can’t disagree with anything here, especially the “doesn’t fill you up” bit. A normal bowl of cereal for me is fairly large, and usually enough to fill me up, but I can eat half a box of the family size Kix and be hungry and hour and a half later.

    But still – Kix is one of my favorites, so I’m choosing to indulge!

  • http://bakerymanis.wordpress.com andrea devon

    i agree with peggy- it seems that the ‘all natural’ claim is bogus marketing maneuver to induce people to think it is perhaps healthy, when it is (most likely) genetically modified corn as the base. i am surprised that the article did not address that fact. what’s up fooducate? where’s the healthy criticism?!

  • WF

    I disagree with Peggy. The extrusion/puffing process does not “make this a very unhealthy food”. Extrusion/puffing has similar effects on foods that baking does. Some heat-sensitive nutrient loss occurs any time food is heated, and this depends on a number of factors, including the time, temperature and pressure.
    The Schroeder article is outdated, and was merely a survey of available products on the market (back in 1970). A better article is “Vitamin Retention in Extruded Foods” in the Journal of Food Composition and Analysis” by Athar (2006). They looked at nutrient content before and after processing to understand how much loss occurs (and the quick heat of extrusion keeps more nutrients than a slower process like baking or roasting).
    And, in terms of nutrient loss from extrusion, the cereal is fortified with a vitamin/mineral mixture AFTER extrusion (see the ingredient list), which more than compensates for any nutrient loss.

  • Brooke

    A very sound assessment, WF. Also, I would like to add that nutrition information is based on the product, not inclusive of nutrients that may have been lost along the processing way, as inferred by Peggy.

  • Corey

    @WF
    Hooray! Real Science!

  • http://www.betterschoolfood.org Dr. Susan Rubin

    Puffed cereals like KIX contain acrylamides. This may be a new word to you and many of your readers, but once you do a little homework on it, you may change your mind about all those over priced puffed and flaked cereals.
    The food industry knows that acrylamides has the potential to be the next big “trans fat” or HFCS. That is why industry front groups like the IFIC Foundation are already producing “webinars” that confuse the issue. Similar to what they did with HFCS and GMOs

    By the way, its a pretty safe assumption that KIX are made from GMO corn. Unless the ingredients list Organic or GMO free corn, its a pretty safe bet that you are eating GMOs. A big and very questionable science experiment in my opinion.

    Last but not least, there is the glycemic index. A breakfast with puffed cereal will shoot blood sugar up in a short amount of time. Kids are unable to sit still, pay attention and learn when their blood sugar is riding up and down like a roller coaster.

    Our kids deserve real food. Ones that are good for the environment and are good for their health. Don’t ya think?

  • http://yahoo Buzz Swanson

    It seems to me the appearance and flavor of Kix have changed within the last month or two – something I’ve noticed during the last two or three boxes I’ve eaten. The balls seem darker, less puffy, and overbaked. With the apparent overbaking, the flavor has also been altered and not (in my opinion) for the good. KIX now has a slight bitter taste reminiscent of Cornnuts. Whether we have a change in recipe or just a bad batch, I prefer the old flavor.

  • Dan Dodge

    I’m with Buzz Swanson. Something seems to have changed in my last 2 boxes of Kix. The balls are darker, less puffy, and definitely taste different. Too bad, cause Kix used to be one of my favorite cerials.

  • http://www.gregstransformation.com Greg Takacs

    I’m not sure if the “not very filling” claim is a valid one. I mean we’re talking about a 110 calories per serving food item. Add in a half a cup of 1% milk and you’re up to 160. Who can call that a meal? How do you expect 160 calories to be filling? A serving of oatmeal is about the same amount of calories and about just as (un)filling. Can you name a food item that you eat 160 calories worth and go “Man, I’m stuffed!”? Because I can’t. I eat KIX as a mid-morning and mid-afternoon snack generally and it sure beats potato chips and 100 calorie cracker packs. For breakfast, you better eat 300-400 calories not a small bowl of cereal!