Here’s Why Coke is Stronger than the Government

Remember the proposed soda tax? The added penny per fluid ounce, generating $50 billion in funds to combat obesity in the next 10 years?

Well, forget about it.

Never mind obesity. To hell with diabetes.

The beverage industry needs to grow its bottom line, and no one is going to to tax its products. Certainly not a bunch of do gooders on behalf of the “nanny-state”.

You see, in this great democracy called America, money votes. And through a series of contributions and investments of the American Beverage Association, the proposed tax has been all but buried.

In a saddening-as-much-as-it-is-enlightening article in the Los Angeles Times, the money trail is revealed. A series of well planned moves by beverage industry lobbyists included:

1. Discrediting researchers from Yale and UCLA who linked soft drink consumption with obesity.

2. Funding of research that showed no relationship between soft drink consumption and obesity. The researchers are or have been on the payroll of the beverage industry at one time.

3. Contribution to Hispanic organizations. Reasoning: the soda tax will hit the poor the most. Hispanic groups are now against the tax, despite diabetes hitting Latino youths especially hard.

4. A $10 million Ad campaign aired on prime time and playing on chords of hard working moms not needing to pay extra in these tough times.

5. Enlisting the aid of other industries in order to thwart the tax:

“The industries in our coalition realized that this is a slippery slope, that once government reaches into the grocery cart, your business could be next,” said Kevin Keane, senior vice president, public affairs, for the American Beverage Assn.

6. A big bribe (north of $600,000) to the American Academy of Family Physicians, to be used to underwrite “educational materials to help consumers make informed decisions.”

What you need to know:

Make no mistake, soda pop and sweetened beverages are a major contributing factor to obesity. The price poor people are paying for their soda now is minuscule compared to their health expenses 10 or 20 years down the road.  Unfortunately, there is no ANTI-Beverage-Association with deep pockets to coordinate a counter offensive.

As long as companies externalize the true cost of their products, gullible consumers will choose cheap and sweet satisfaction now, with heart disease and heartache down the road. This must end, but as you can see, there are no effective mechanisms, even at government levels, to stave off the power of corporate lobbies.

And with the recent supreme court decision to allow unlimited campaign contribution by companies to our politicians, you can rest assured Washington DC will NOT make an effort to change things.

What to do at the supermarket:

If you want to impact change, stop buying liquid calories. Switch to tap water. Switch your whole family. Switch as many of your friends and neighbors as you can to do the same. You’ll save money, you’ll save your health.

New! Choose a better breakfast with CerealScan™ by Fooducate

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Get Fooducated

  • http://www.betterschoolfood.org Dr Susan Rubin

    You’ve nailed it right! The soda industry will not go down with out a fight. Don’t forgetpseudoscientifiic organizations like Jeff Stier’s ASCH “The American Council on Science and Health” which is fully funded by the cigarette, soda and food industries. They will be out in full force with op-eds, bogus science based articles and studies working hard to shift the minds of consumers.
    And of course, the Center for Consumer Freedom. Another well funded group that will work to keep the status quo.
    Tap water is the ONLY beverage that won’t do damage to your family’s health.
    How can public health activists work to get that message out in a way that will shift the hearts and minds of Americans?

  • http://www.lovehealthyliving.net Carrie

    ARGH!!!! That’s the sound of my frustration at the beverage industry and all of the sell-outs who are holding up any kind of reasonable change for the health of our citizens. I really don’t understand how taxing sodas is any different from taxing cigarettes. Thanks for helping bring this issue to light with your post. Well done.

  • http://www.betterschoolfood.org Dr. Susan Rubin

    A quick little correction to my statement that ACSH is “fully” funded by the cigs, sodas and food gang. They are only partially funded by this segment of corporate America. My mistake!

    You can learn more about who they are and some other fun facts about this group by visiting Source Watch
    http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=American_Council_on_Science_and_Health

  • Heidi

    I fully agree with the fact that pop contributes highly to obesity, BUT i do have an issue with the statement
    “The price poor people are paying for their soda now is minuscule compared to their health expenses 10 or 20 years down the road.”
    While the soda price/ healthcare comparison is right on i have a large issue with the target of “poor people”. It is NOT just poor people who buy and consume soda. While, some lower educated people may give pop to their kids in excess i am disgusted with the target of poor people specifically.

  • http://www.fooducate.com/blog Editorial Staff

    Heidi – the context of “poor people” was a counter punch to the campaign by BIG-BEV as siding with the poorer demographic that will be “hurt most” by the proposed soda tax.
    In no way was there an intention to insult any specific group of consumers.

  • http://theorganicgreencownextdoor.blogspot.com/ Smokey

    The danger does not end with sodas. BIG-BEV also controls the sports drink market and is moving in on the “energy” drink segment as well.

    As a parent of two college athletes, I have nightmares now due to the way we consumed the so-called sports drinks as they were growing up…

    The most effective way to combat BIG-BEV, BIG-FOOD, BIG-AG…is to continue to bring awareness and education to the consumer.

  • http://www.betterschoolfood.org Dr Susan Rubin

    Hey Smokey,
    As a parent of athletes, you might want to check out this lecture by a pediatric endocrinologist on how fruit juice and corn syrup containing ingredients will fatten up livers just like alcohol does!
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBnniua6-oM

    It’s not just the calorie, this stuff functions as a metabolic poison!

  • http://theorganicgreencownextdoor.blogspot.com/ Smokey

    Dr. Rubin,

    I have seen that! Was just over to your on your site…BRAVO!

    Our whole family are now dedicated to water, water and…water. Supplemented by organic milk…though not from Horizon :) AND I have my black coffee…some habits are hard to break.

    When we can get people to understand that single ingredient food will do magical things for your health, that fresh and truly ripe foods will do the same…patience, patience, patience…

  • Fight the Power

    So having read all of this…

    What is a practical solution for common people to make our voice heard? Awareness is great for those individuals that are concerned and visit this site. But who should we contact to collectivize our voices… If this site named one person or place to send a letter or email we could all join in to fight the power. Otherwise we sit and think and maybe talk to a random local representative.

  • http://www.fooducate.com/blog Editorial Staff

    @Fight the Power
    Help Fooducate spread the word…

  • Heidi

    just imagine how much more food poorer people could get if people could not buy soda with EBT cards. how much would soda companies lose out on from that money? Even though i recieve benefits for the time being, it still disgusts me that the state pays for people’s soda habits. They changed it so you cannot buy most energy drinks on EBT cards because they lack nutritiinal value but why would they still allow soda? Do you think the soda companies have a pull in all of it? I would LOVE to see people not allowed to buy things like soda and snack cakes. I have heard arguements that it would restrict the freedom we have to buy on the EBT but really, do you think if people could no longer buy soda or certain snacks with little or no nutrition that they would still not use the EBT card for what they could buy with it? I thnk not. People on WIC use the WIC checks even though certain healthy things may not be their preference. It is almost like they want poor people to stay overweight. @Editorial Staff

  • Christine

    EBT (formerly known as “food stamps”) has nothing whatever to do with nutrition, or with the needs of poor people. It exists as a tool for American agribusiness to sell more of its products, by subsidizing the purchase of those products. The nature of EBT will never change as long as the funding of EBT is dependent on the votes of farm state senators. (Which is to say that it will never change.)

    Thus EBT cards can be used to buy soda, sweetened with corn grown right here in the USA. The growing of that corn is itself underwritten by farm subsidies, so the purchase of soda is subsidized on at least two levels, even though soda is an expensive item with absolutely no nutritional value. It is a kind of anti-food, making you fat without making you strong.

    Let’s see if Michelle Obama is willing to take on any of vested interests. My guess is no. She won’t be allowed to.