Confused about Omega-3?

Consumer interest in omega-3 is not as high this year as it was in the 2005-2007 time frame. Perhaps it’s because we’ve been inundated by so many omega-3 messages on the news, web, and supermarket that most of us have simply come to accept the easy to remember association:  “omega-3 = good”.  In the same time period we also learned that “trans-fat = evil”.

It’s a bit like Star Wars , what with the dark and light side of the force. The “force” here is fatty acids, or what dietary fats (animal fat and vegetable oils) are composed of.

While the trans-fat message is quite simple at the practical level – just avoid products containing it – with omega 3 things are a bit more complicated. And when something is not as simple as good/bad, you can be sure there’s lots of money to be made off of the public’s ignorance. Enter the thousands of processed products now marked with “omega-3″ in large font type on the front of the package.

The analogy to Star Wars ends here because not all omega-3′s are created equal. Which means you may be buying a product fortified with omega-3 that has almost no health benefits for you. Yet you will likely be paying more than you would have for the standard, un-enriched version. In order to better understand what’s going on, here’s a quick primer on omega-3, in 10 bullet points.

What you need to know:
1. Food can be broken down to three categories – protein, carbohydrate, fat. Our bodies need all three to function.

2. Fats can be broken down into the “good” and “bad” fats (though this is an over-simplification). The bad fats are “saturated” and “tran-fats” – they increase the risks of heart disease, for example.

3. The “good” or “heart healthy” fats are called unsaturated fats and they are further divided into polyunsaturated and mono-unsaturated fats. They can be found in olive oil, walnuts, avocado, and fish.

4. Fats are actually composed of different types of fatty-acids. It is the fatty acids that are saturated or unsaturated. For example, Canola oil is regarded a healthy oil because it is composed of 90% unsaturated fatty acids – oleic acid, linoleic acid and linolenic acid, and only 10% saturated fats.

5. Fatty acids are further broken down into groups based on their chemical makeup. The omega-3, omega-6, omega-9 classification of fatty acids is based on position of certain carbon-bonds inside the fatty acid molecule. This was the most difficult part of the post, so hang in there. Omega-3 and omega-6 are also called “essential fatty acids”; this means our body does not manufacture them on its own, so we need to get them from food.

6. If you’re still with us, omega-3 is actually a family of fatty acids which includes alpha-linolenic acid (ALA), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). All three are polyunsaturated (reminder: that means good).

7. Studies have proven unequivocally that omega-3 consumption is good for our health, in an all round sort of fashion. From raising the IQ of unborn babies, to better heart health, and even more mental stability.

8. But not all omega-3 fatty acids yield the same benefit. They are further classified into 2 groups -  “long chain” such as DHA and EPA, and “short chain” such as ALA (alpha linolenic acid). The long chain fatty acids are the ones that are considered most beneficial. They are readily available from oils of cold water fish such as salmon, sardines, and mackerel.  The short chain ALA is found in flax seeds and chia seeds for example.

9. The human body does know to turn ALA into the more useful EPA and DHA but only at a 10-15% efficiency. The omega-3 health claims have  regulatory organizations in a tizzy, because manufacturers are fortifying foods with cheap (read vegetable) sources of omega-3 in order to plaster health claims on them, when in fact they may prove less beneficial than omega-3 sourced from fish oils.

10. To complicate things even further, it appears that high omega-3 consumption is not enough. The proportion of omega-3 to omega-6 fatty acids in our bodies also plays a role in improving our health. The modern diet has raised our consumption of omega-6 (through soybean and corn oils) to levels that way too high compared to our omega-3 levels. This imbalance needs to be rectified by either consuming less omega-6, or more omega-3.

What to do at the supermarket:

As you can see from the above example, nutrition is quite complex. Scientists are discovering new interactions every day. And while better understanding of how our body works with nutrients is important, let’s keep in mind that food itself has been, for thousands of years, a pretty straightforward affair: Grow, harvest, prepare. And somehow, humanity survived.

The modern supermarket has changed our relationship to food. Now it’s pretty much just one verb -  “buy”.

While fortification with omega-3 in all sorts of prepared foods won’t cause harm, and in some cases be healthy for you, the naturally good sources of omega-3 are sardines, salmon, flax oil, with other seeds and nuts to some extent.

Help us test our new food comparison tool: alpha.fooducate.com

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Get Fooducated

  • http://twitter.com/idblog Beth

    Nice summary of omega-3. But I was surprised about the blanket statement re saturated fats in point 2. You note that it’s an “over-simplification” and it surely is!

    I think it’s worth pointing out that lots of people — even more mainstream folks — are questioning the link between saturated fat and risk of heart disease. E.g., see this from NutritionData:

    http://blog.nutritiondata.com/heart_health_blog/2009/07/saturated-fats-and-cardiovascular-health.html

  • http://www.betterschoolfood.org Dr. Susan Rubin

    If you want to fully understand the omega 3/ omega 6/ saturated fat story, The Queen of Fats by Susan Allport is a great read. When we try to “simplify” things, truth gets lost in the translation! Saturated fat is NOT the bad boy that we’ve all been led to believe.

    We’ve fallen in this oversimplification trap with concepts like “calories” , carbs and fat! Thats why kids are now munching baked chips, diet drinks and 100 calorie packs and continuing to put on the pounds.

  • http://www.leenlife.com Jurek Kawalek

    Hi, I am depp involved into the Omega 3 business due to my business. After starting to ork with plant based omega 3 I have firstly educated myself, gathering informations form both “industries” Asked for the offer by one of the biggest supplier of fish based omega 3 oils, I have asked finally for the heavy metals contamination. The answer as “If you like we clean it” “But I want to use it for food production(?)” “Well, it is food quality” It is true EPA and DHA is most beneficial kind of Omega 3. But the relationship between 6 and 3 should be max. 5:1= if it is less it is better for you (2:1 most beneficial) If RDI for OMega 6 is about 10g/day so most beneficial situation is you take 5g EPA/DHA to have right proportion that Omega 6 do not take over the limited enzymes for derviates of Omega 3. Please try to calculate how much you have to eat fish or take capsules to get this ratio. Is good to kno that the usually mentioned percentage of Omega 3 in Fish oils is on the trigliceride base = the standard 30% means including glycerien = lefts in best case 25% of Real EPA and DHA on the mas base. By 5g/day you have to consume 4 times more fish oil. 20g = approx. 4 tea spoons a day. On the other side you need finally 250g / day of DPA +DHA(RDI) The conversion of ALA to EPA and DHA is lying by 4% and 10%.By 2g per day = finally 240g and the ratio is 5:1. So there is a strong lobby of fish oil and a weak lobby of plant omega. The fish oil business you can controll with some volume of money and product is not to increase as you like = plant based yes = price deterioration and anybody can enter the business. Ther is no money to earn in the medium and long term = no investments, no lobby interests. But most ridiculous is the scientific statement “the adventage of fish based omega 3 outrages the disadvantages” You hart will be helathy, even if you die on something else….

  • http://www.leenlife.com Jurek Kawalek

    sorry for mistakes “Your heart..” etc. If you like to comment write to me jkawalek@web.de

  • Carol

    There is only one allowed claim for omega-3 fats, and it is a qualified health claim (requires lots of disclaimer language on the package) pertaining to DHA and EPA content, NOT ALA content, so any food product that makes a health claim for ALA (short-chain) omega-3 fatty acids is mislabeled.
    http://www.fda.gov/Food/LabelingNutrition/LabelClaims/QualifiedHealthClaims/ucm073992.htm#omega3

    Nutrient content claims (“good source,” etc.) are prohibited for any form of omega-3 fats, because there is no Daily Value established for these fats. Ditto for “implied” omega-3 content claims such as “contains omega 3,” unless it specifies (truthfully) the actual amount of omega 3 contained. Tons of products violate these rules.

  • uRDietitian

    I agree with some of the comments about this article being overly simplified. It is a great starting point for most consumers, but if you would like something a little more in depth check out . . .

    http://naturalbias.com/what-you-should-know-about-essential-fatty-acids/

  • Frank Jenkins

    My question is: I am a 67 year old male who takes Raw One For Men (multi-vitamin) I started this brand due to the whold food ingredients. I am confused by all the information on Omega 3. I presently take Nature Bounty Omega 3+D3 which is made with anchovy, mackerel and sardines. I have recently watch a commercial regarding a prescription type fish oil. Would you please clarify what is the best (outside of eating properly) Omega 3 Fish Oil to buy and consume? Thank you for your input.

  • Lisa Morgan

    test