The (un)Natural History of Sweet – From Sugar to Stevia

This was the week of stevia, a new zero calorie sweetener, that got FDA approval as a safe food additive, and will shortly find its way into soft drinks and other products scattered about our supermarket aisles. If you are confused about all the different sweetening options out there, you are not alone. Once upon a time, it was either honey or cane sugar. But then came the industrial revolution…

(Grab a cup of coffee, take a deep breath, this is a long post)

10,000 BC – archeological evidence of honey harvesting by humans. Honey has 4 calories per gram.

6000 BC – first use of sugar sourced from sugar cane. The cane is crushed, the liquid boiled and purified, and when dried  crystallines are formed. Sugar has 4 calories per gram.

1000+ AD – Stevia leaves are chewed and used in teas by tribes in Central and South America.

1879 – Saccharin is accidentally discovered at Johns Hopkins university. Much sweeter than sugar, with a slightly bitter aftertaste, it became commercially available soon after, but did not gain much popularity. Saccharin has zero calories and is 300 times sweeter than sugar. Trivial fact – honey bees will not eat saccharin.

1907 – First USDA investigation of harmful side effects of saccharin.

1915 – Sugar shortages during World War I helped bolster sales of saccharin.

1931 – French researchers isolate the compounds responsible for stevia leaves’ sweetness.  Stevioside and rebaudioside are 250–300 times sweeter than sucrose, heat stable, and have zero calories. They are natural substances, as oppose to artificially produced sweeteners such as saccharin.

1937 – Cyclamate, an artificial sweetener, is discovered at the University of Illinois, again, by accident. Cyclamate has zero calories and is 30 times sweeter than sugar.

1938 – The Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act is passed by Congress. The FDA is given the authority to oversee the safety of food, drugs, and cosmetics.

1957 – Sweet’N Low, a blend of Saccharin, dextrose and cream of tartar is introduced to market as a table sugar alternative. The pink packets go on to become a cultural icon.

1958 – Cyclamate is granted GRAS status (generally regarded as safe) by the FDA.

1958 – The Delaney Ammendment to the Food, Drugs, and Cosmetic Act states:  “the Secretary of the Food and Drug Administration shall not approve for use in food any chemical additive found to induce cancer in man, or, after tests, found to induce cancer in animals.”

1963 – Coca Cola’s introduces Tab, a diet soda sweetened with saccharin.

1965 – Aspartame is accidentally discovered in a laboratory of a company later acquired by Monsanto. Aspartame is a zero calorie artificial sweetener 200 times sweeter than sugar. Some people don’t like its taste because it reacts with other food flavors. It will take 15 years to get it approved for use as a food additive. Another drawback is limited shelf life of aspartame sweetened drinks because its active ingredient breaks down in water. Aspartame is 100-200 times sweeter than sugar and has zero calories.

1967 – German chemist discovers Acesulfame K, 200 times sweeter than sugar, with a bitter aftertaste adn zero calories.

1969 – Cyclamate is banned by the FDA, after research links it to cancer in mice. To this day, it is still banned in the US.

1971 – First commercial use of stevia in Japanese soft drinks.

1970′s – The high cost of sugar leads soft drink manufacturers to look for other solutions. A farm subsidy system that created huge corn surpluses triggered a switch from sugar to high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS). The sweetener is produced by milling the corn to produce a starch and then processing that corn starch to yield corn syrup. The cost of HFCS is much lower in the US than sugar. HFCS has 4 calories per gram.

1976 – Sucralose is discovered by scientists from Tate & Lyle and King’s College London. Sucralose is 600 times sweeter than sugar and has zero calories.

1977 – The FDA propose to ban saccharin, after the publication of a studies showing that rats fed large doses had high rates of cancer. Saccharin is the only artificial sweetener on the market at the time. A huge public outcry ensues, orchestrated by various lobbies, which helped Saccharin survive.

1977 – The Saccharin Study and Labeling Act allows saccharin to continue to be sold but requires a warning label – “Use of this product may be hazardous to your health”.

1981 – Despite testing that suggested aspartame caused brain tumors in rats, the FDA approves its use.

1981 – Nutrasweet, a brand name aspartame sweetener, is introduced to markets as a table sugar alternative in blue packets.

1982 – Diet Coke is introduced, using rising star aspartame as the artificial sweetener of choice.

1984 – Coca Cola and Pepsi, the #1 and #2 soft drink manufacturers switch from sugar to HFCS in the US. In other countries, they continue to use sugar. Since then, obesity rates in the US have shot up and many fingers have been pointed at HFCS as the culprit. Studies have not yielded a definite answer. Researchers agree that there is a correlation, but argue as to causality. The jury is still out.

1985 – A request to re-approve cyclamate is filed, after it is found that the tests showing it causes cancer were flawed.

1988 – Acesulfame K is approved for use in foods by the FDA. Ever since, it is used in addition to other artificial sweetners such as aspartame and sucralose.

1991 – the FDA labels stevia as an “unsafe food additive” and restricts its import. Some believe this was done at the behest of the companies manufacturing artificial sweeteners based on aspartame.

1992 – Nutrasweet patents expire, allowing additional companies to produce and market aspartame. Equal is one.

1992 – FDA approve the use of Neotame, a new sweetener from the Nutrasweet company. Neotame, 10,o00 times sweeter than sugar, will fail to achieve siginificant market success.

1998 – FDA rejects petitions to ban Acesulfame K despite indications that it may lead to health problems.

1998 – Sucralose is approved by the FDA, paving the way for the yellow packets of Splenda table sugar alternative.

2000 -  Congress repeals the law requiring saccharin products to carry warning labels.

2008 – The Corn Refiners Association, trying to quell consumer unease with high fructose corn syrup, initiates a full blown TV advertisement campaign.

2008 – 18 years after the FDA deemed it unsafe, stevia is granted GRAS status. For more details see here and here

Today the best selling zero calorie sweetener in the US is Splenda by far, with Nutrasweet in 2nd place, and saccharin a close third. Now that its “kosher” it will be intersting to see where stevia sales will be in a few years.

By the way,  what sweetener was in your cup of coffee?

Sources: Marion Nestle’s What to Eat , James P. Collman’s Naturally Dangerous, FDA, Coca Cola Company, Wikipedia

If you liked this history lesson, read 1862 – 2008: A Brief History of Food and Nutrition Labeling.

Get Fooducated: RSS Subscription or Email Subscription

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Get Fooducated

  • http://www.littlestomaks.com/about/ TwinToddlersDad

    Great post; excellent information.
    Do you know if there are any products for children (fruit juice, yogurt etc) that use Stevia or are planned for the market using Stevie in the near future?

    • didyb

      I got a water flavorer called True Raspberry Lemonade (1 pkt flavors one bottle of water) the other day at the grocery store. I got it because it had Stevia instead of the other sweeteners. Note, though, I got it for my 48 year old husband. Not meaning to sound preachy, but kids need to have sugar sweetened items in moderation, and drink WATER. (the all caps is me yelling at my kids, not you :) )

  • Jerry Siegel

    Why did you omit Tagatose? Also completely natural, and actually has therapeutic effects for diabetics!

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_ZZCD5K4CYLXILS4AGFYICRWFNU warbaby

       http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11079825.Does willy nilly things to the liver.

  • http://www.overnightlows.net Mel

    Also curious that Xylitol is not mentioned.

    I had stevia in my coffee this morning and will tomorrow morning, too.

  • Random Wanderer

    I drink tea, not coffee. :)

    But these days I either drink my tea “black”, as the coffee equivalent goes, or I use honey.

  • Tina

    Just the other day, we picked up a “pink packet” at Burger King to sweeten our ice tea. Just before using it, we noticed that it said “Nutrasweet Pink” not “Sweet n’ Low”. Nutrasweet Pink has neotame in it – which I had never heard of before. I came home and checked it out on the web — it’s worse than aspertame (from the same- Monsanto)! I was angry, even more so when I thought about the deception involved. People are going to assume they are using saccharine by the pink packet. It’s always been saccharine-pink, asperatame-blue, Splenda-yellow, sugar-white. There’s also a Nutrasweet Gold, which is a combination of artifical and sugar. I’m glad stevia is on the front-line now.

  • SuseM

    I had stevia in my coffee this morning. I have almost destroyed my health with Splenda, but being naive about the FDA ( not anymore!) I had no idea what was happening to me. I went from a healthy, happy person to a depressed, anxious, achy and crippled person in less than two months of high amounts of sucralose ( Splenda) while on Atkins. I was drinking it in Vita Rain from Costco, in Atkins shakes, even in the glucosomine-chondroitin-msm drink that was supposed to help my joints which by this time crippled my knees and left hip and left me unable to walk without a cane. The FDA doesn’t care about us, Johnson & Johnson doesn’t care about us ( I am boycotting ALL of their and their subsidiaries products). Splenda is like eating DDT, and it is a CRIME that it is allowed to be consumed. Stevia is the best thing I have found, and I am very grateful to have found it.

  • Laura H.

    I use Stevita brand “spoonable Stevia” in packets. It is a blend of stevia and erythritol. It doesn’t have an unpleasant taste that others have objected to. I am in no way associated with the company, just a fan. Their website is http://www.stevitastevia.com (click “products” and see the explanation of the different choices of stevia products.) If you have tried one brand or form of the supplement, and didn’t like it, don’t give up! The products are not all alike!

    This is what I put in my herb tea at home, and carry in my purse to restaurants for iced tea.

  • http://www.coffeesingleserve.com Marcus

    Very interesting post, as are some of your other posts. I have bookmarked your great site for future visits.

  • August Bulat

    Stevia was used in Vernors Ginger Ale from the Civil War till the FDA outlawed it in 1991. That represents over 100 years of use right here in the U.S. Vernors started here in Detroit. Somehow I feel the sugar and artificial sweetener companies bought the FDA. You can’t patent Stevia since it comes from plants but the money grubbers will arrange a way for exclusive rights to sell us something as natural as air.

  • Staci

    @SuseM
    To SuseM-
    perhaps it was the Atkins that contributed to your problems, rather than Splenda?

  • Nikki

    I stick with sugar or honey. I’d consider stevia, but I’m not crazy about the taste. I’d rather use sweeteners that I can readily identify their path from plant to plate.

  • http://Stevia Urban

    Stevia comes in several forms/types. The liguid has to be stored in refrigerator after container is opened. I myself started with splendia, switched to sugar alcohol Xylitol(got soft stools), found stevia (Truvia) at supermarket then switched to NuStevia (1/2 price Truvia at co-op) which is stevia mixed with maltodextrin for easier measuring. I can highly recommed the stevia products though though there is some evidence that Xylitol is better for your teeth (that is if you dont get soft stools). Splendia worries me about its composition.

  • Mankind

    Mankind’s Tech IS Mankind’s DOOM!! Be Forewarned!!!

  • type at home

    What this country needs is a good five-cent nickel.

  • LaurelC

    Great article. Very informative. Found recently that all of my different “issues” are from artificial sweetners…. won’t touch any of that stuff ever again. I would rather be overweight than uncomfortable, etc etc etc.

  • laura

    laurel c. Your LESS likely to be owerweight with controlled consumption of natural sugars instead of the artificial stuff. Check out the research.

  • http://brt-insights.blogspot.com/2009/09/hydration-fruit-ade-natural-fruit.html Fruit-Ade homemade natural sports drink

    Stevia is useful as a flavor enhancer in my homemade sports drink recipe. The stevia clear liquid concentrates from SweetLeaf and Now Foods are very sweet and don’t have any bad aftertastes.
    http://brt-insights.blogspot.com/2009/10/stevia-natural-sweetener-enhances.html

  • Zolar1

    I used Splenda earlier this year until I developed bad headaches. I stopped using it, and my headaches subsided a bit.

    Recently on a headache free day, I tried Splenda again in my coffee.
    Within minutes I developed severe headaches.

    It took a few days of not using Splenda for my headaches to almost go away.

    And many things that a Diabetic would buy in the grocery store are beginning to have Splenda in it. So, what’s a diabetic to eat anymore?

    Vegetarian is OUT for me…

  • http://www.joycecherrier.com/coachjoyce Joyce Cherrier

    What a great post! Always lots of opinions when it comes to our obsession with sugary stuff. First time I’ve seen a history and really loved reading it! Thanks :)

  • http://theconnectivoresdilemma.wordpress.com Melissa

    nice recap! i just did a blog post about sugars recently too. and to answer your question of what sweetener is in my cup – pure organic sugar cane from a local CT farm :)

  • http://thoroughlypure.com/ Kevin M. Jones

    Great article!! Thank you.

    I found it while researching stevia because of a local company that just started as a college assignment. KD energy bites, thoroughlypure.com, really caught my eye in a local paper for how they got started. It’s great to see kids being so productive, but this group is really on top of nutrition too.

    I feel like I know a lot more about their sweetener now, and that is what I was after. But, Please support this young company as they are really the kind of business amaricans should support. They focus on health, nutrition and a sound business model. And, who doesn’t want to see the youth succeed?

  • Ann

    Thank you for this article! Great information!

    Actually, I had a small drizzle of honey in my coffee this morning. Been around since 10,000 BC and no evidence that it causes cancer in anybody! Works for me!

    Actually, I completely boycotted artificial sweetners many years ago. I started developing massive headaches for no particular reason. Once the doc ruled out all the normal possible causes, he asked me to write down everything I ate for two weeks. After I showed him the list, he asked me to replace all the products that contain artificial sweetners with the normally sweetened versions, and pick up one extra cardio workout per week to offset the increase in calories. It worked! No more headaches (and no weight gain)!!! I can’t say for certain that the lack of artificial sweetner was the breakthrough for getting rid of the headaches, but even now when I try a Diet Coke or artifically sweetened protien powder (got to watch those closely…..it’s difficult to find one that is not artifically sweetened….) I can feel the headaches coming on again. Strange. So now, I’m a Honey Girl all the way!

  • Sheldon

    Although many apparently likeminded people are praising this as an “excellent post,” it’s actually full of hyperbole and inaccuracies.

    First of all, your use of phrases like “To this day, X is still banned in the U.S.” sounds like something a high school student would write, and clearly shows your bias toward “warning” people against some horrible product. It’s also redundant. If something is “still” banned, then of course it’s banned “to this day.” It’s rather like saying, “My dad is really, super tall.”

    Also, most of the sweeteners you listed as having zero calories actually don’t. The FDA standard for “zero calories” means that it has fewer than 5 calories per serving. This is true of sugar and honey, as well as the other sweeteners you mentioned.

    You should also keep in mind that “artificial” doesn’t make something unhealthy anymore than “natural” makes something healthy. Cyanide is natural, but I wouldn’t call it healthy.

  • http://wellnessforallnow.blogspot.com/ Janice Epstein

    As sugested at the start of the post, I did get myself a cup of coffee and, since I have repeatedly experienced negative reactions to most artificial sweeteners, I sweeten with plain old sugar. While, as Sheldon writes, being natural does not make something automatically healthy, most people I know have fewer instances of negative reactions consuming natural vs. artificial products. Of the things meant to be consumed and nourish my body, using natural has just proven to be a good rule of thumb.

    Why is the food industry so bent on finding alternatives to the natural sweeteners that are already available to them? I think the cost of sugar (see entries for 1915 and 1970′s) is logically what is behind the continued search. And why shouldn’t it be? Industry has a responsibility to be ever watchful of the bottom line. I just think there are lines you don’t cross. At some point, citizens’ health is more important than the bottom line.

    Thanks for this history lesson!

  • http://www.freewiredesigns.etsy.com sharyn

    I have for the last 4 years been touting the artificial sugars thing. I have been saying that we should ban all artificial sugars from the foods we eat and our diet completely! In the medical realm of things they are seeing more and more auto immune issues and I truly believe that it is the food and drink that we are ingesting among the external hazards that are costing us our lives and our health. We take apart every good thing we eat and put parts and pieces in processed foods instead of the whole food that has so many benefits. I use pure cane sugar only and have for the past 4 years.
    I wonder why we as a society must have food that lasts longer and longer on the shelves? That shelf life is killing us slowly and making our everyday health unbearable. Our fertility rates in the US are dropping and I believe it is all the foods we eat. Also if you want an interesting topic check out all the soy in our foods….(not soy lecithin). Men beware too much soy creates estrogens in your bodies and women too.

  • Donna

    My 59 year old husband suffers from has seizures. His diagnosis is and has been epilepsy since he was 9 years old. He is on medication to control his seizures. After 30+ years of marriage, I have FINALLY determined that the frequency of his “break through” seizures are in direct correlation to his ingestion of ASPARTAME and MONOSODIUM GLUTAMATE and the excito-toxins that metabolize into these poisons. If you research excito-toxins you will see that they directly affect neurological function. SHIT. I have since started preparing only ‘PURE” foods – soups, rice dishes, my own gravies and the like. TWO “break through” seizures in one year – both times after EATING OUT……… Like Gracie Slick sang, “Feed your brain” with GOOD STUFF.

  • J.

    Over the past few years, agave sweetener has become a staple in my pantry. It really is sweeter than honey, only it doesn’t have the same trigger-to-overeat factor of sugar and the like.

    Personally, I don’t “get” why EVERYTHING has to be sweetened to death. Why put sugar on fruit, for example? Fruit is already sweet!

  • http://rjbaker.org.uk Robert Baker

    I totally agree with Sheldon; sadly, everyone else in this thread seems to have got individual idisyncracy (just about anything you care to name causes *somebody* to have an adverse reaction) confused with medical fact. (I myself tend to get headaches if I consume very much saccharin, but that doesn’t “prove” that “saccharin is bad” for *everybody*.)

    I could see where the article was heading when, early on, it said without qualification that “stevia is natural” — well, so is arsenic, but I won’t be putting that in my coffee anytime soon. :) This article carefully omits to mention several key facts: (1) the various studies allegedly “proving harm” from various sweeteners were all done at such stupidly high dose levels (far beyond what anyone would consume in a year, never mind a day) as to prove only the long-established fact that there is no such thing as a non-toxic substance, there are only substances whose LD50 isn’t yet known (only a couple of years ago, there was a woman in an ill-thought-out competition who died of water toxicity); (2) perhaps because of this, the former UK ban on cyclamates has been repealed; (3) stevia is banned throughout the EU, because tests done by the Belgian equivalent of the FDA (at sensible dose levels, not ridiculously high ones) have proven it to be toxic.

    There’s also the fact that artificial sweeteners have for the most part been used for decades (saccharin for over 100 years); if there were serious *general* health problems from them, they would surely have turned up by now. In particular, I find it mind-boggling that something is described as “worse than aspartame” when aspartame is probably the safest sweetener of all (its breakdown products are two *natural* and very common amino acids) — far safer than sugar for me at any rate. :)

  • Amy

    Donald Rumsfeld was head of Searle, manufacturers of Aspartame in 1981, and on President Reagan’s transition team. He helped appoint the commissioner of the FDA, Arthur Hull Hayes, who went on to approve aspartame despite years of controversy. Food and politics go hand in hand.

  • Janette Marshall

    The food industry has “a duty” to invent things………this is what they do. If they didn’t keep inventing chemical substitutes to ram down our throats we would not be nations of overweight and tired people all in danger of becoming diabetes sufferers. We have a choice, stop buying these chemicals they force us to consume and if you really have to eat sweet things…….eat honey, pure, wonderful raw honey packed with essential ingredients for great nutrition and health. Life can be as simple or as complicated as we wish to make it!

  • Lisa

    Not telling anyone else what to do or consume, but for the record, if aspartame breaks down into “natural” things, then I must not be consuming the natural things it breaks down into. I am violently allergic to aspartame, anaphylaxis is NOT worth poisoning myself with this stuff. Honey is my sweetener of choice when I absolutely must have something sweet.

  • Birdland

    Providing practical advice for buying healthy food at the supermarket. NOT selling pills, supplements, or diets. NO industry affiliations.

    Not much science or accuracy either. I can see why our collective science knowledge in the US is going down the tubes.
    “Some research” has linked stevia to cancer, but no one seems to mention that, because it’s natural. And if it’s natural it must be totally safe.  Unless you are consuming massive amount of something in the food supply, it’s “safe” unless you have an allergy or actually have a reaction. Besides stevia tastes awful.